Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42339747›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026

Age-period-cohort analysis of low birth weight, early-term delivery, induction, and cesarean-section, US births 1990-2019.

Chloe A Teasdale, Sean Locke, Zachary Shahn, Saskia Rueda, Elizabeth A Kelly, Francisco Bolumar, Heidi E Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chloe A TeasdaleDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York (CUNY), Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy (SPH), New York, NY, United States.
Sean LockeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York (CUNY), Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy (SPH), New York, NY, United States.
Zachary ShahnDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York (CUNY), Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy (SPH), New York, NY, United States.
Saskia RuedaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York (CUNY), Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy (SPH), New York, NY, United States.
Elizabeth A KellyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Francisco BolumarDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York (CUNY), Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy (SPH), New York, NY, United States.
Heidi E JonesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York (CUNY), Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy (SPH), New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4285-3752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted an age-period-cohort (APC) analysis to distinguish age, period, and cohort effects underlying temporal trends in low birth weight (LBW: <2500 g), early-term deliveries (ETD: 37-38 weeks), induction, and cesarean-section (c-section) using US birth records from 1994-2019 for all singleton, first, full-term (37-44 weeks gestation) births (n = 8 194 523). Using the APC-interaction method, we estimated age, period, and cohort effects as odds ratios with 95% CI. Age and period effects were observed for all outcomes. Pregnant women/people aged 40-44 years had increased odds of LBW (OR 1.23, 95% CI, 1.19-1.26), ETD (OR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.23-1.26), induction (OR 1.05, 95% CI, 1.04-1.06), and c-section (OR 2.28, 95% CI, 2.26-2.30) compared to the total population. Odds of LBW (OR 1.14, 95% CI, 1.13-1.16), ETD (OR 1.11, 95% CI, 1.10-1.12), and induction (OR 1.71, 95%,CI, 1.70-1.72) were higher in 2019 compared to the study period average. Cohort effects not explained by age and period effects were observed for women aged 40-44 years in 2019 indicated by higher odds of ETD (OR 1.08, 95% CI, 1.05-1.10), induction (1.10, 95% CI, 1.07-1.12), and c-section (OR 1.09, 95% CI, 1.06-1.11). These findings suggest obstetric management of pregnant women ≥40 years changed in recent decades in ways not expected based on age and temporal trends alone.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionInfant, Low Birth WeightLabor, InducedAdultAdvanced Maternal AgeAge FactorsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal AgePregnancyUnited Statesage-period-cohortAPCcohort effectsc-sectionearly-term deliveryinductionlow birth weightmaternal age

Identifiers

PMID42339747
PMCPMC13642371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.