ArticleJournal of cell science2026
Cumulus cells enhance oocyte genomic quality control by promoting DNA damage-induced meiotic arrest.
Article in Journal of cell science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cumulus cells are known to maintain oocyte arrest at prophase I through gap junction-mediated cAMP signalling, but their role after meiotic resumption remains unclear. Here, we show that cumulus cells enhance oocyte genomic quality control by sensitizing mouse oocytes to DNA damage-induced meiotic arrest. Time-lapse imaging of SiR-tubulin-labelled spindles revealed that oocytes from cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) matured faster than denuded oocytes (DOs). Upon mild DNA damage induced by low-dose etoposide, COC oocytes arrested at metaphase I, whereas DOs completed maturation despite similar levels of DNA lesions. This arrest required spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) activity, as reversine rescued polar body extrusion and BubR1 and Mad2 were elevated in COCs but not DOs. Disruption of gap junctions or inhibition of mTOR signalling abolished the checkpoint response. Notably, cumulus cells did not enhance oocyte response to minor spindle perturbations. These findings reveal a previously unrecognized role of cumulus cells in mediating DNA damage-induced SAC activation, providing post-GVBD genomic surveillance beyond prophase I arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.