ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
Perception, knowledge and attitudes of Ecuadorian dentists towards patients with molar incisor hypomineralization.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH) is one of the most prevalent enamel development defects in contemporary dental practice. Understanding perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes of professionals towards this condition is key to optimizing clinical protocols and improving therapeutic results. Objective: To evaluate the perception, knowledge and attitudes of Ecuadorian dentists about diagnosis and management of patients with MIH. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was carried out using a self-administered survey of registered dentists in Ecuador. A validated 19-question questionnaire was applied that explored demographic characteristics, knowledge of etiology and prevalence, attitudes towards clinical management, and therapeutic choices. In addition, two clinical cases with photographic support were included to evaluate treatment decisions. The statistical analysis incorporated descriptive statistics, chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: A total of 352 dentists participated, predominantly working in private practice (71.9%), particularly in general dentistry (61.1%). Most practitioners reported observing MIH monthly (45.7%) and perceived an increase in its occurrence (67.0%). Demarcated opacities were the most frequent clinical manifestation (93.2%), with antibiotics being the main reported etiological factor (31.8%). The frequency of observation varied significantly between specialties ( Conclusions: MIH is recognized as a growing and complex problem. It is frequently observed with demarcated opacities as the predominant sign and antibiotics as the main etiological factor. Its management is challenging, and professional experience appears to influence clinical knowledge. Continuing education and the development of standardized clinical protocols are needed to strengthen professional competence in MIH management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.