Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42339449›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cognition2024

Victim impact statements limit the effects of perspective taking on juror decisions.

Jeanine Lee McHugh Skorinko, Sean Laurent, Emily Bendremer, Kaitlyn Schneider, Valicia Hale, Alisionna Iannacchione, Melissa Paris, Gizem Demircioglu, Kyla Wesley, Julia LaValley and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jeanine Lee McHugh SkorinkoPsychological and Cognitive Sciences Program, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States.
Sean LaurentDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University (PSU), University Park, PA, United States.
Emily BendremerPsychological and Cognitive Sciences Program, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States.
Kaitlyn SchneiderPsychological and Cognitive Sciences Program, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States.
Valicia HalePsychological and Cognitive Sciences Program, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States.
Alisionna IannacchionePsychological and Cognitive Sciences Program, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States.
Melissa ParisPsychological and Cognitive Sciences Program, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States.
Gizem DemirciogluPsychological and Cognitive Sciences Program, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States.
Kyla WesleyPsychological and Cognitive Sciences Program, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States.
Julia LaValleyPsychological and Cognitive Sciences Program, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States.
Angelica DeFreitasPsychological and Cognitive Sciences Program, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, United States.
Jeremy BlumenthalCollege of Law, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Past work suggests that victim impact statements (VISs) encourage jurors to take victims' perspectives, but this has not been explored empirically. Across four experiments (total

Indexed as

death penaltydecision makingmock jurorsperspective takingvictim impact statements

Identifiers

PMID42339449
PMCPMC13281215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.