Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42339445›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cognition2024

Classifying musical reading expertise by eye-movement analysis using machine learning.

Véronique Drai-Zerbib, Manon Ansart, Clément Grenot, Bénédicte Poulin-Charronnat, Joris Perra, Thierry Baccino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Véronique Drai-ZerbibLaboratoire d'Étude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement, LEAD - CNRS UMR5022, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Manon AnsartLaboratoire d'Étude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement, LEAD - CNRS UMR5022, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Clément GrenotLaboratoire d'Étude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement, LEAD - CNRS UMR5022, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Bénédicte Poulin-CharronnatLaboratoire d'Étude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement, LEAD - CNRS UMR5022, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Joris PerraLaboratoire d'Étude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement, LEAD - CNRS UMR5022, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Thierry BaccinoLaboratoire d'Étude de l'Apprentissage et du Développement, LEAD - CNRS UMR5022, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Music reading is the key to literacy for musicians in the Western music tradition. This high-level activity requires an efficient extraction of the visual information from the score to the current needs of the execution. Differences in eye movements between expert and non-expert musicians during music reading have been shown. The present study goes further, using a machine learning approach to classify musicians according to their level of expertise in analyzing their eye movements and performance during sight-reading. We used a support vector machine (SVM) technique to (a) investigate whether the underlying expertise in musical reading could be reliably inferred from eye movements, performance, and subjective measures collected across five levels of expertise and (b) determine the best predictors for classifying expertise from 24 visual measures (e.g., the number of progressive fixations, the number of regressive fixations, pupil size, first-pass fixations, and second-pass fixations), 10 performance measures (e.g., eye-hand span, velocity, latency, play duration, tempo, and false notes), and 4 subjective measures (perceived complexity and cognitive skills). Eye movements from 68 pianists at five different levels of music expertise (according to their level in the conservatory of music-from first cycle to professional) were co-registered with their piano performance via a Musical Instrument Digital Interface, while they sight-read classical and contemporary music scores. Results revealed relevant classifications based on the SVM analysis. The model optimally classified the lower levels of expertise (1 and 2) compared to the higher levels (3, 4, and 5) and the medium level (3) compared to higher levels (4 and 5). Furthermore, across a total of 38 measures, the model identified the four best predictors of the level of expertise: the sum of fixations by note, the number of blinks, the number of fixations, and the average fixation duration. Thus, efficiently classifying musical reading expertise from musicians' eye movements and performance using SVM is possible. The results have important theoretical and practical implications for music cognition and pedagogy, enhancing the specialized eye and performance behaviors required for an expert music reading.

Indexed as

classificationexpertiseeye movementsmachine learningmusicianssight readingSVM

Identifiers

PMID42339445
PMCPMC13281050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.