ArticleFrontiers in cognition2024
Successful generalization of conceptual knowledge after training to remember specific events.
Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mental bootstrapping enables human-level concept learning in self-supervised deep models.Science advances · 2026Article
- From cognitive abstraction to adaptive behavior: neural bases of concept learning in autistic adolescents.Molecular autism · 2026Article
- From cognitive abstraction to adaptive behavior: neural bases of concept learning in autistic adolescents.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Categorization involves grouping information to make inferences and support novel decisions. In the laboratory, category learning tasks commonly involve trial-and-error where participants are instructed to classify stimuli and learn through feedback. Here, we tested across two experiments whether people can acquire category knowledge in an incidental manner by associating category members with other information that itself is structured, and how it compares to acquiring category knowledge directly through feedback-based classification training. Methods: Subjects were trained to remember specific associations consisting of cartoon animals paired with animal-specific background scenes. Animals presented on forest vs. mountain scenes were members of two prototype-based categories, but this was not conveyed to the participants. Spontaneous category learning was tested by asking participants to guess habitat (mountains, forests) for old and new cartoon animals without feedback. Results: We found that participants spontaneously acquired category knowledge, showing high categorization accuracy for new animals, comparable to a group that underwent a traditional feedback-based classification training with the same stimuli. Strategy analysis showed that the majority of participants in both groups abstracted the central tendency of the categories, albeit a somewhat larger proportion of subjects relied on memory for specific training exemplars after paired-associate learning. Partial evidence was found for the hypothesis that generalized knowledge emerged at the expense of memory for specific animal-scene associations. Discussion: The findings show that despite the goal to remember specific information that required differentiation of stimuli within categories, subjects can spontaneously acquire category knowledge, generalizable to novel stimuli in a way comparable to traditional supervised classification training. This work provides new insights into how category learning can proceed under more naturalistic demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.