ArticleFrontiers in cognition2024
The time course of hypoxia effects using an aviation survival trainer.
Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of acute hypoxic exposure on multiple-object tracking ability of flight trainees.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- EEG as a neural measure of hypoxia-related impairment.Frontiers in cognition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reduced environmental oxygen levels at high altitudes can result in hypoxic hypoxia, which remains a primary threat in tactical aviation. Hypoxia broadly impairs cognition and can degrade a pilot's ability to safely operate the aircraft. Current hypoxia countermeasures include aircraft life support systems that deliver supplemental oxygen and using controlled hypoxia exposures to train aviators to recognize symptoms. To maximize the effectiveness of these countermeasures, it is critical to understand how hypoxia impacts performance and associated neurocognitive outcomes. We previously showed that a neural marker that indexes sensory processing integrity is sensitive to hypoxia impairment. Methods: Here, we extend this line of research closer to the training environment by using hypoxia simulation equipment currently standard in aviation survival training. In a single-blind, repeated-measures, counterbalanced design, we exposed 34 healthy participants to either normoxic air (ground level) or normobaric hypoxia (altitude equivalent gradually increasing from 10 to 25k') for 20 min after a 10 min baseline at ground level. During the exposure, participants completed a cognitive assessment battery while passively elicited neural responses to auditory tones were recorded using electroencephalography (EEG). Participants reported their hypoxia symptoms throughout and upon completion of their exposures. Results: We found that the hypoxia exposure rapidly elicited the predicted physiological responses in peripheral oxygen saturation (decrease) and heart rate (increase) within 2-3 minutes of exposure onset. On average, participants reported hypoxia symptoms in a delayed manner, ~8 min following the exposure onset. Performance on the cognitive tasks was relatively unaffected by hypoxia for basic tasks including Stroop, fine motor tracking, color vision and arithmetic, but was significantly degraded by hypoxia for more advanced tasks that combined a visual search component with Stroop and a working memory task. EEG activity associated with pre-attentive auditory processing was impaired on average shortly after the first symptom report, ~10 min from exposure start. Discussion: Together, these results move hypoxia research closer to conditions encountered in aviation survival training and support the use of training devices for future hypoxia research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.