ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2026
Associative emotional memory encoding: insights from network stability analysis of an fMRI-driven bilinear dynamics.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The interplay between emotion and memory is a central topic in cognitive neuroscience, with open questions about the underlying neuronal mechanisms. This article aims to study the effects of order and intensity of emotional information on associative memory encoding. To this aim, we employ dynamic causal modeling to model the dynamic network composed of the hippocampus, amygdala, and orbitofrontal cortex during an fMRI associative memory encoding task and apply graph and control theory tools to obtain novel insights. Methods: Participants were clustered into three condition groups, neutral-neutral, neutral-emotional, or emotional-emotional, and viewed image pairs associated with their assigned condition. Using the dynamic causal modeling framework, we explore several dynamic models and show that a stochastic bilinear state-space model best describes the neuronal dynamics in all conditions. Furthermore, we use graph and control theory techniques to both validate and analyze the model. Particularly, we analyze the network dynamics of each condition using tools from graph theory and stability theory and discuss the differences in the strength and direction of connectivity as well as stability of each of these networks. Results: We confirm the prior finding that memory is enhanced in the neutral-emotional condition. In our work, this enhanced memory is associated with the increased hippocampus-amygdala coupling strength in this condition. Moreover, we show that in the emotional-emotional condition, coupling of hippocampus and amygdala, as well as the whole network connectivity increases. We further predict that the hippocampus-amygdala connectivity in this condition increases, when the first image's valence is substantially less negative rated than the second image, but decreases otherwise. This pattern mirrors the neutral-emotional condition, where the first image is emotionally neutral compared with the second. Moreover, our model-based analyses suggest that the amygdala predominantly influences the other two regions in the neutral-emotional condition. Conclusion: Combined data-driven DCM modeling, stability analyses, and graph-theory tools led to new insights and enhanced the mechanistic understanding of dynamics of emotional associative memory. We discuss these insights, utilize these analytical tools to generalize our findings to some unmeasured conditions, and highlight the potential of these techniques to inform the development of future technological or pharmacological approaches targeting regulatory mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.