ReviewAnaesthesia reports
Penicillin allergy de-labelling by non-allergy specialists in the elective surgical setting: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol.
Review in Anaesthesia reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penicillin allergy labels are common in elective surgical patients, although most are incorrect. These labels often prevent the use of first-line surgical prophylaxis, and alternative antibiotic choices are associated with patient harm and antimicrobial resistance. There is a need for effective pre-operative penicillin allergy de-labelling services, but demand cannot be matched by allergists alone, making non-allergist-led approaches particularly important. Such services have been implemented in a range of health care settings, although their design, level of allergist supervision, implementation and clinical effectiveness vary. The elective surgical population is a promising cohort for these interventions, but has been studied less than inpatient groups. We aim to synthesise quantitative and qualitative evidence on non-allergist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling interventions in elective surgical populations. Studies involving penicillin allergy de-labelling by non-allergist healthcare professionals in the elective surgical setting will be eligible, including quantitative studies of clinical effectiveness and economic evaluations, and qualitative studies exploring experiences, perceptions or implementation factors. A mixed-methods systematic review will be conducted using a convergent segregated approach in line with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Systematic searches will be performed across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies will be screened and data extracted independently by two reviewers. Quantitative and qualitative findings will be synthesised separately and then integrated to identify convergence, divergence and complementarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.