ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Rapidly progressive angiomatous epulis: How to differentiate a benign gingival lesion from malignancy?
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiomatous epulis, also known as vascular epulis or gingival pyogenic granuloma, is a benign reactive gingival lesion characterized by marked capillary proliferation. It typically develops in response to chronic local irritation, trauma, inflammatory stimuli, or hormonal influences. Clinically, it presents as a rapidly growing erythematous to violaceous gingival mass with a marked tendency to bleed, which may mimic malignant gingival tumors and raise diagnostic concern. Although the diagnosis is primarily based on clinicopathological correlation, imaging plays an important complementary role. Radiological evaluation, particularly computed tomography (CT), is useful to assess lesion extent, confirm its superficial localization, and exclude aggressive features such as bone erosion or deep tissue invasion. Imaging also contributes to the differential diagnosis by helping distinguish angiomatous epulis from other gingival lesions, including peripheral giant cell granuloma, peripheral ossifying fibroma, vascular malformations, and malignant tumors. We report the case of a 15-year-old patient presenting with a rapidly progressive gingival mass evolving over two months. Periapical radiography demonstrated preserved alveolar bone architecture, while CT imaging confirmed a well-circumscribed soft-tissue lesion confined to the gingiva, without cortical bone destruction, periodontal ligament alteration, or extension to adjacent structures. Given the rapid growth and bleeding tendency, imaging was essential to exclude malignancy and guide management. Complete surgical excision was performed, and histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of angiomatous epulis. This case highlights the added value of imaging in the diagnostic workup of vascular gingival lesions, particularly in differentiating benign entities from malignant conditions and in supporting appropriate therapeutic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.