ArticleF1000Research2026
Regulatory Design and Long-Term Growth: Insights from China's Experience for Latin America.
Article in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Regulatory efficiency is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of long-term economic growth. China's institutional consolidation offers a comparative reference case for understanding how streamlined procedures, and coordinated governance can reduce transaction costs and foster development. In contrast, many Latin American countries face persistent administrative complexity that may hinder growth. Methods: This study applies Institutional Theory and Transaction Cost Economics. Using panel-data estimations with fixed- and random-effects models, the analysis examines the relationship between regulatory indicators-procedural requirements, compliance costs, and business-environment scores-and GDP per capita growth. Macroeconomic controls such as trade openness, inflation, capital formation, and rule of law are included. China serves as a comparative model against selected Latin American countries. Results: The results show a robust and statistically significant association between lower regulatory frictions and stronger economic performance. China's coherent and strategically aligned regulatory framework is linked to higher and more stable GDP per capita growth. In contrast, Latin America exhibits persistent procedural delays, and higher compliance costs, which correspond to weaker and more volatile growth outcomes. Panel-data and dummy-variable regressions consistently confirm China's superior performance as a reference for effective regulatory design. Conclusions: This study provides quantitative evidence that regulatory design and institutional coordination are decisive for long-term economic growth. By highlighting the growth costs of administrative inefficiency and the benefits of coherent regulation, the findings inform policy strategies aimed at improving institutional quality and fostering sustainable development. Comparative reference, such as China, demonstrate how regulatory performance can enhance productivity and macroeconomic stability in emerging economies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.