ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026
Are tomorrow's dentists ready for a sustainable future? Insights from a European student survey.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The significant environmental impact related to modern dental practices highlights the need for increased awareness and attitude shifts among future European dentists. Therefore, this study aimed to assess dental students' perceptions and knowledge levels regarding sustainability in oral healthcare across Europe. Methods: The study was conducted among 175 students from 14 dental schools in 11 European countries, who completed an online questionnaire. Results: Most respondents were female (71%) vs. male (27%), with a mean age of 21.1 ± 2.9 years (18-33). 56% of the respondents correctly identified all three dental sustainability definitions, with no gender differences. Dental activities perceived as having the highest environmental impact were patient care (single-use cups and materials) (51%), dental equipment (18%), and dental materials (14%), with no significant gender differences. Students' top strategies to reduce environmental impact of dentistry were reducing plastic disposables (77%), using technologies like 3D printing/CAD-CAM (56%), and digital data management (55%). Dental procedures considered to have the highest carbon footprint were amalgam/composite fillings (44%), radiographs (35%), and acrylic dentures (32%). Additionally, 42% of the students expressed interest in an elective course on sustainability in dental practice. Conclusions: By exploring future practitioners' understanding of sustainability, this research could offer perspectives that may be useful in shaping curriculum considerations, fostering environmentally responsible clinical training, and supporting policy dialogue at institutional and European levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.