ArticleFrontiers in cognition2025
Individual differences in brain attention networks: the challenge of indexing temporal change.
Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The vigilance decrement in speed and accuracy of response is prevalent in studies of sustained attention. The amplitudes of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) elicited by task stimuli also show temporal decline. However, it is difficult to link the behavioral performance decrement to loss of efficiency in the specific brain circuits that control human attention. A recent study published by the authors used an extended duration-version of the Attention Network Test to explore temporal changes in behavioral and electroencephalographic indices in executive control, alerting, and orienting attention networks. This study found evidence for temporal decline in ERPs associated with the alerting network, as well as slowing of uncued reaction time. This study, like most psychophysiological studies of sustained attention, analyzed group data. The present article provides new analyses of data from the authors' previous study to investigate individual differences in loss of attention on the extended ANT, and their relationships with positive and negative affect. Data analyses addressed the temporal stability of attention network metrics, inter-relationships between different metrics, and associations between metrics and affective states. Results illustrated some challenges in assessment of brain networks at the individual level on tasks requiring sustained attention. Issues included differential temporal stability of metrics, divergence of behavioral and ERP measures, and distinguishing changes in network function from changes in baseline response. The ANT is well-supported by group data as a tool for investigating attentional functioning. However, the present results suggest that caution is necessary in utilizing network indices at the individual level in clinical and other applied contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.