Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42339226›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cognition2025

Individual differences in brain attention networks: the challenge of indexing temporal change.

Gerald Matthews, Almira Kustubayeva, Manzura Zholdassova, Gulnur Borbassova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gerald MatthewsDepartment of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.
Almira KustubayevaDepartment of Biophysics, Biomedicine, and Neuroscience, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Manzura ZholdassovaDepartment of Biophysics, Biomedicine, and Neuroscience, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Gulnur BorbassovaDepartment of Biophysics, Biomedicine, and Neuroscience, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vigilance decrement in speed and accuracy of response is prevalent in studies of sustained attention. The amplitudes of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) elicited by task stimuli also show temporal decline. However, it is difficult to link the behavioral performance decrement to loss of efficiency in the specific brain circuits that control human attention. A recent study published by the authors used an extended duration-version of the Attention Network Test to explore temporal changes in behavioral and electroencephalographic indices in executive control, alerting, and orienting attention networks. This study found evidence for temporal decline in ERPs associated with the alerting network, as well as slowing of uncued reaction time. This study, like most psychophysiological studies of sustained attention, analyzed group data. The present article provides new analyses of data from the authors' previous study to investigate individual differences in loss of attention on the extended ANT, and their relationships with positive and negative affect. Data analyses addressed the temporal stability of attention network metrics, inter-relationships between different metrics, and associations between metrics and affective states. Results illustrated some challenges in assessment of brain networks at the individual level on tasks requiring sustained attention. Issues included differential temporal stability of metrics, divergence of behavioral and ERP measures, and distinguishing changes in network function from changes in baseline response. The ANT is well-supported by group data as a tool for investigating attentional functioning. However, the present results suggest that caution is necessary in utilizing network indices at the individual level in clinical and other applied contexts.

Indexed as

affectalertingattention networkscognitive neuroscienceevent-related potentialsindividual differencessustained attention

Identifiers

PMID42339226
PMCPMC13281110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.