ArticleFrontiers in cognition2025
Bi-temporal processing in music notation reading: a theory linking prediction, memory, and automaticity.
Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Notation Type and Score Difficulty on Eye Movements During Erhu Sight-Reading.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reading music notation requires musicians to extract and interpret visual information in real time while simultaneously anticipating future performance actions. This dual engagement, in which one acts in the present while processing material to be performed in the future, suggests that music reading relies on a bi-temporal cognitive architecture. Grounded in this premise, this theoretical paper develops a model that integrates Hebbian learning and automaticity as core mechanisms supporting the simultaneous perceptual and anticipatory demands of notation-based music performance. A systematic review of neuroimaging studies involving music-reading tasks was conducted to evaluate current evidence on the neural correlates of notation processing. The results of the review showed that music reading engaged distributed cortical and subcortical networks, including regions commonly implicated in text reading, and recruited auditory-motor integration systems essential for music performance. However, most studies isolated single parameters of notation (e.g., pitch identification), thereby limiting ecological validity and constraining interpretations of how musicians process in real-world contexts that require concurrent multi-parameter integration. Complementary research on cognitive prediction, sensorimotor coupling, and perceptual-motor learning demonstrates that musicians employ a dual-pathway system of immediate perception and forward prediction, shaped by Hebbian synaptic strengthening and the development of automaticity through repeated procedural engagement. Synthesizing these findings, this article proposes a bi-temporal cognitive model of music-notation processing that accounts for dynamic interplay between associative learning, predictive processing, and automated motor execution. The implications of this model for cognitive theory and music pedagogy are discussed, with recommendations for empirical approaches to test the bi-temporal framework and advance understanding of real-time cognitive coordination in music performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.