Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42339215›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cognition2025

Measuring relational memory in older and younger adults.

Jennifer N Sexton, Lillian Behm, Jill A Rose, Connor J Phipps, Meghan K Ramirez, Abi M Heller-Wight, Anna F Wilhelm, Emma A Armbruster, Carolyn E Nagengast, David E Warren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer N SextonDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Lillian BehmDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Jill A RoseDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Connor J PhippsDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Meghan K RamirezDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Abi M Heller-WightDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Anna F WilhelmDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Emma A ArmbrusterDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Carolyn E NagengastDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
David E WarrenDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.

Funding

Measuring neurodevelopmental effects of polygenic risk for Alzheimer's disease via longitudinal study of brain and cognitive variables in periadolescent childrenR01AG064247 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI WARREN, DAVID E · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Changes in cognitive abilities including memory accompany normal aging, and certain types of memory are particularly susceptible to age-related change. The ability to link aspects of an experience to form one cohesive memory, called relational memory, is essential to normal memory throughout the lifespan. Relational memory facilitates the binding of arbitrarily related stimuli and encompasses all manner of relations (spatial, associative, sequential). Prior work has studied differences in relational memory associated with aging but has investigated specific aspects of relational memory in a siloed fashion: earlier studies typically have not simultaneously assessed multiple aspects of relational memory in the same participants in the same paradigm. Methods: In the current study, multiple aspects of relational memory were simultaneously compared between healthy younger adults (19-35 years, Results: We found that older adults had reduced memory performance relative to younger adults on each condition of the memory task (item condition, space condition, re-pair condition, and time condition), and there was a condition-by-age group interaction such that differences were greatest for the time and space conditions. Discussion: We found age-related differences between young and older adults on a task simultaneously testing multiple types of relational memory with young adults performing better overall. Additionally, we observed condition-level interactions such that the age-related differences were greater for the time and space conditions than the re-pair condition. Together, these findings underscore the importance of measuring memory for all manner of relations using the same study format to achieve a thorough characterization of the complex nuances of relational memory performance across the lifespan.

Indexed as

agingassociative memoryepisodic memoryitem memoryrelational memory

Identifiers

PMID42339215
PMCPMC13281124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.