ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Redesigning Medicaid frailty algorithms: improved identification of medically frail adults under community engagement.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Between 2018 and 2024, 14 US states sought or obtained Section 1115 waivers to condition Medicaid expansion coverage on community engagement requirements, with medically frail exemptions determined from claims-based administrative data; the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (Public Law 119-21) codified these requirements nationally, with state implementation due by January 2027. Using American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample data from 75 043 Medicaid-enrolled adults aged 19-64 across 17 states, we simulated frailty identification under each state's existing algorithm via a 3-channel Monte Carlo microsimulation incorporating algorithm design, claims visibility, and documentation burden. Existing algorithms identified a mean of 31.4% of adults with functional disability as medically frail (range: 14.3% [Florida, Arizona] to 45.4% [New York]). An evidence-based redesigned algorithm incorporating expanded diagnostic criteria, health information exchange integration, ex parte determination, and elimination of physician certification requirements increased mean identification to 45.6% (+14.3% points), with gains across all 17 states. In multi-dimensional equity evaluation, the redesigned algorithm narrowed the American Indian/Alaska Native-White sensitivity gap by 46% (from 11.6% to 6.3% points) and the Black-White gap by 10% (from 12.8% to 11.5% points); within-race rural-urban sensitivity differences of 3%-5% points persisted under both algorithms. Adoption of the redesigned algorithm would identify an estimated 3.8 million additional medically frail adults and avert approximately 253 000 coverage losses under full implementation. These findings support minimum algorithmic design standards for state frailty determination systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.