Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42339128›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Neurofilament light and glial fibrillary acidic protein do not reflect neuronal or glial damage during different intracranial radiotherapy regimes: a pilot study.

Yvonne Dzierma, Holger Sebb, Michael Utzig, Nurlan Abdullayev, Christian Berdel, Christian Ruebe, Jochen Fleckenstein, Markus Hecht, Guido Hildebrandt, Mathias Jucker and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yvonne DziermaKlinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitatsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Holger SebbKlinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitatsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Michael UtzigKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.
Nurlan AbdullayevKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian BerdelKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.
Christian RuebeKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.
Jochen FleckensteinKlinik für Strahlentherapie, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Markus HechtKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.
Guido HildebrandtKlinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitatsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Mathias JuckerHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Kristina HeyneBiobank der Medizinischen Fakultät, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) have been shown to be non-specific markers of central nervous system damage and have been associated with the occurrence of primary or secondary brain tumours. However, the response of these markers to cerebral radiotherapy has not been explored to date. Methods: In this pilot study, we measured NfL and GFAP levels before, during, and after radiotherapy, as well as during follow-up, in a representative clinical cohort of patients treated with percutaneous radiotherapy either for single or multiple brain metastases, for glioblastoma, or with whole-brain irradiation. Results: We confirmed elevated NfL and GFAP levels in all patients before the start of radiotherapy. A significant increase after the onset of radiotherapy was not observed. During long-term follow-up, most cases of decreasing NfL and GFAP values correlated with treatment response, whereas the most pronounced increases in serum NfL levels were followed by the detection of several new cerebral lesions. Conclusion: Cerebral radiation injury does not appear to correlate with increased NfL and GFAP levels during radiotherapy. After treatment, NfL and GFAP remain suitable candidates for follow-up and possibly for the early detection of new lesions.

Indexed as

glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)neurofilament light (NfL)neurooncologyradiotherapystereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID42339128
PMCPMC13283840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.