ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Neurofilament light and glial fibrillary acidic protein do not reflect neuronal or glial damage during different intracranial radiotherapy regimes: a pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) have been shown to be non-specific markers of central nervous system damage and have been associated with the occurrence of primary or secondary brain tumours. However, the response of these markers to cerebral radiotherapy has not been explored to date. Methods: In this pilot study, we measured NfL and GFAP levels before, during, and after radiotherapy, as well as during follow-up, in a representative clinical cohort of patients treated with percutaneous radiotherapy either for single or multiple brain metastases, for glioblastoma, or with whole-brain irradiation. Results: We confirmed elevated NfL and GFAP levels in all patients before the start of radiotherapy. A significant increase after the onset of radiotherapy was not observed. During long-term follow-up, most cases of decreasing NfL and GFAP values correlated with treatment response, whereas the most pronounced increases in serum NfL levels were followed by the detection of several new cerebral lesions. Conclusion: Cerebral radiation injury does not appear to correlate with increased NfL and GFAP levels during radiotherapy. After treatment, NfL and GFAP remain suitable candidates for follow-up and possibly for the early detection of new lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.