SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Safety and efficacy of cytokine-induced killer cells for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) cell therapy shows promising antitumor effects in gastric cancer (GC). Given variability in clinical outcomes across studies, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess overall safety and efficacy. Methods: Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched for studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of CIK/dendritic cell-cytokine-induced killer cell (DC-CIK) cell therapy in gastric cancer. Time-to-event outcomes (OS, DFS, PFS) were synthesized using hazard ratios (HRs); fixed time-point survival effects from 6 months to 5 years were additionally summarized in supplementary analyses. Fixed- or random-effects models were applied as appropriate. Publication bias was examined using Begg's test and funnel plots, and robustness was explored with the Trim-and-Fill method. Safety and secondary outcomes (e.g., adverse events and T-lymphocyte subsets) were summarized descriptively. Results: A total of 22 trials including 2,149 patients were included. After risk-of-bias assessment, 13 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. Pooled HRs showed significant benefits of CIK/DC-CIK plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone: OS (9 studies; 1,047 patients) HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.48-0.75; p<0.001), PFS (4 studies; 418 patients) HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.46-0.77; p<0.001), and DFS (4 studies; 523 patients) HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.58-0.86; p<0.001). ORR showed a non-significant trend in favor of CIK/DC-CIK (3 studies; 225 patients; pooled log OR 0.46, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.99; p=0.09), while DCR was significantly improved (3 studies; 225 patients; pooled log OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.45; p=0.01). Immunological analyses showed increased CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ T cells, with a slight decrease in CD8+ cells. Fever was the most frequently reported infusion-related adverse event, and no fatal adverse events were reported; however, grade ≥3 adverse events were inconsistently reported and could not be pooled, limiting certainty regarding comparative safety. No geographic restriction was applied; however, all identified eligible studies were conducted in China. Conclusion: Based on available studies, CIK/CIK-DC immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy significantly improves OS, PFS, and DFS in patients with gastric cancer and increases the DCR, without inducing severe adverse effects. Although these findings suggest potential benefit, validation in more diverse populations is needed. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251160258.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.