ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Recurrent intracranial hemorrhage without brain metastasis after VEGFR TKI rechallenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs) are widely used in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although hemorrhagic events are recognized adverse effects of these agents, intracranial hemorrhage is rare, and the safety of re-administration of VEGFR TKIs after central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhage remains unclear. We report a 52-year-old man with metastatic clear cell RCC who initially received first-line immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab, resulting in disease progression, followed by second-line sunitinib, which achieved a partial response. However, he subsequently developed sudden neurological deterioration, and brain imaging revealed multifocal cerebellar hemorrhages without evidence of brain metastasis; the absence of metastasis was confirmed by surgical and histopathological examination. After surgical management, complete radiologic resolution of the hemorrhage was confirmed 4 weeks postoperatively. Pazopanib was subsequently initiated based on the prior favorable response to VEGFR TKI therapy; however, recurrent cerebellar hemorrhage occurred within 4 weeks of rechallenge, leading to rapid clinical deterioration and death despite supportive care. This case highlights that VEGFR TKI-associated intracranial hemorrhage can occur even in the absence of brain metastases and may recur with fatal consequences upon rechallenge. These findings suggest that early VEGFR TKI rechallenge (<1-2 months) after CNS hemorrhage may be unsafe, and that careful risk-benefit assessment with an adequate waiting period is essential when considering re-administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.