ArticleJPRAS open2026
Autologous fibroblast therapy for facial rejuvenation: A randomized open-label controlled study.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aging process of the face is characterized by dermal thinning, loss of elasticity, and wrinkle formation. Injection of autologous micrografts containing fibroblasts (Am-FBs) has emerged as a promising regenerative technique. Objectives: This trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Am-FBs for facial rejuvenation. Methods: A randomized, open-label, controlled study was conducted. Forty patients presenting with mild to moderate dermal thinning, reduced elasticity, and wrinkles were divided into two groups: a study group (SG; n = 20) that received Am-FBs treatment and a control group (CG; n = 20) treated with a hyaluronic acid (HA)-based skin booster. Both groups received treatment at baseline (T0), at one month (T1), and at three months (T2). Clinical outcomes were evaluated at T1, T2, T3 (6 months), and T4 (12 months) through patient and physician evaluations, the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), and objective skin elasticity metrics. Results: At T4, the SG showed significantly greater improvements in wrinkle depth, skin elasticity, and WSRS score than the CG ( Conclusions: Am-FBs significantly improve signs of facial aging and present a safe option for skin rejuvenation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.