Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Application of a Novel Desirability of Outcome Ranking Endpoint Incorporating a Framework for Resistance Assessment and Microbiologic Evaluation in Antibiotic Trials: A Proof-of-Concept in a Post Hoc Analysis of the BALANCE Trial.
Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What's Behind DOOR Number 2? Recent Applications From Post-Hoc Analyses of Infectious Diseases Randomized Clinical Trials.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) with Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk (RADAR) has been suggested as an outcome for antibiotic duration trials. An endpoint incorporating a measure of antimicrobial resistance may better reflect trade-offs between different antibiotic strategies. Methods: We constructed a novel endpoint, DOOR-FRAME (Framework for Resistance Assessment and Microbiologic Evaluation), and applied it as a proof-of-concept in a post hoc analysis of the BALANCE trial comparing 7- versus 14-day antibiotic duration for uncomplicated non- Results: Two hundred seventy-one participants were included. The DOOR distributions were similar between the 7- and 14-day groups, with PI of 46.8% (95% CI 40.4%-53.2%) using DOOR alone. Nine (6.9%) and 12 (8.5%) patients in the 7 and 14-day group respectively had ARO/CDI within 180 days. Probabilistic index was 53.6% (95% CI 46.7%-60.4%) with DOOR-RADAR and 47.4% (95% CI 40.9%-53.8%) with DOOR-FRAME. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in DOOR outcomes at 180 days between patients with uncomplicated BSI treated with 7 versus 14-day antibiotic duration. Incorporating a novel measure of antimicrobial resistance did not change interpretation of the trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.