Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338985›Full record

Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2026

Application of a Novel Desirability of Outcome Ranking Endpoint Incorporating a Framework for Resistance Assessment and Microbiologic Evaluation in Antibiotic Trials: A Proof-of-Concept in a Post Hoc Analysis of the BALANCE Trial.

Sean W X Ong, Aditi Patrikar, Ruxandra Pinto, Robert K Mahar, Asgar Rishu, Joshua S Davis, Robert A Fowler, Steven Y C Tong, Nick Daneman

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sean W X OngInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-436X
Aditi PatrikarICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ruxandra PintoInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3712-4624
Robert K MaharCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Asgar RishuSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joshua S DavisSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Robert A FowlerInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Steven Y C TongDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1368-8356
Nick DanemanInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) with Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk (RADAR) has been suggested as an outcome for antibiotic duration trials. An endpoint incorporating a measure of antimicrobial resistance may better reflect trade-offs between different antibiotic strategies. Methods: We constructed a novel endpoint, DOOR-FRAME (Framework for Resistance Assessment and Microbiologic Evaluation), and applied it as a proof-of-concept in a post hoc analysis of the BALANCE trial comparing 7- versus 14-day antibiotic duration for uncomplicated non- Results: Two hundred seventy-one participants were included. The DOOR distributions were similar between the 7- and 14-day groups, with PI of 46.8% (95% CI 40.4%-53.2%) using DOOR alone. Nine (6.9%) and 12 (8.5%) patients in the 7 and 14-day group respectively had ARO/CDI within 180 days. Probabilistic index was 53.6% (95% CI 46.7%-60.4%) with DOOR-RADAR and 47.4% (95% CI 40.9%-53.8%) with DOOR-FRAME. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in DOOR outcomes at 180 days between patients with uncomplicated BSI treated with 7 versus 14-day antibiotic duration. Incorporating a novel measure of antimicrobial resistance did not change interpretation of the trial.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipbloodstream infectionsdesirability of outcome ranking

Identifiers

PMID42338985
PMCPMC13284868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.