ArticleFrontiers in nephrology2026
Comparative bioequivalence of 1 mg and 4 mg tacrolimus extended-release tablets: randomized, open label, fully replicate, crossover trials in healthy adult subjects.
Article in Frontiers in nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: These studies were planned to establish bioequivalence between two doses (1-mg and 4-mg) of test product (tacrolimus extended-release tablets manufactured by Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India) with reference product (Envarsus XR Methods: These were open-label, randomized, two-treatments, four-periods, two-sequence, oral single-dose, fully-replicate, crossover trials in healthy subjects under fasting and fed conditions. The study included subjects aged 18-45 years, with a body mass index of 18.5-29.9 kg/m Results: The analysis set included a total of 85 (1-mg fasting), 83 (1-mg fed), 85 (4-mg fasting), and 85 (4-mg fed) subjects. Similar demographics were observed across all subjects. Results showed comparable C Conclusion: The developed tacrolimus test product (1-mg and 4-mg) was bioequivalent to the reference product, was well-tolerated, and provided a well-acceptable alternative to the reference product. These studies were performed in healthy individuals, further studies in transplant patient populations to confirm clinical applicability are warranted. CTRI number: These studies have not been registered on the CTRI portal. The studies are routine BA/BE studies conducted in healthy volunteers. As per prevailing regulatory guidance, CTRI registration is not mandatory for such normal BA/BE studies. Additionally, the product under evaluation is already approved worldwide, and the studies do not constitute interventional clinical trials in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.