ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Attitudes, and practices toward allergic rhinitis: a comparative cross-sectional study of patients and non-patients in China.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common immunoglobulin E-mediated inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa, with a globally rising prevalence. Patient knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) significantly influence disease management, yet systematic KAP assessments comparing AR patients and non-AR participants remain limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the KAP levels related to AR between patients diagnosed with AR and non-AR individuals, and to identify factors associated with knowledge levels. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted among patients attending the otolaryngology department of a tertiary hospital in Chengdu, China, from September to December 2022. A self-designed KAP questionnaire covering demographic characteristics, AR-related knowledge (20 items), attitudes (3 items), and preventive practices was administered. Knowledge scores were categorized into "adequate" (≥ 12) and "inadequate" (< 12). Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with knowledge levels. Results: Among 933 valid respondents, 462 (49.51%) were diagnosed with AR. AR patients had significantly higher overall knowledge scores than non-AR participants (mean 14.0 vs. 10.6, Conclusion: AR patients possess better AR-related knowledge and stronger behavioral intentions than non-AR individuals, yet critical knowledge gaps and low treatment confidence persist. Targeted health education should address specific knowledge deficiencies and integrate psychological support to improve patient trust and self-management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.