ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Lightweight deep learning for medical imaging using MobileNetV2-based brain pathology classification with Grad-CAM interpretability.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Computed Tomography (CT) brain scans are crucial for diagnosing various neurological conditions, including tumors, cancer, and aneurysms. CT brain scans are essential for guiding treatment decisions and monitoring disease progression. In this study, we propose a novel framework for brain CT image classification that leverages convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) pre-processing, transfer learning with multiple deep models, and ensemble prediction techniques. The primary objective is to enhance the accuracy and interpretability of brain abnormality detection. Methods: Our approach uses a comprehensive dataset of CT brain scans that undergo meticulous pre-processing to ensure data integrity and uniformity, and employs Grad-CAM for interpretability. We employ four state-of-the-art pre-trained models: MobileNetV2, ResNet-50, EfficientNet-B0, and VGG-16, each serving as a feature extractor, followed by a classification head tailored to our specific task. Results: The experimental results demonstrate that MobileNetV2 and the Ensemble model achieved the highest classification accuracy of 97.44% with macro-AUC scores of 0.9895 and 0.9914, respectively, followed by VGG16 with 92.31% accuracy and the highest macro-AUC of 0.9962. In contrast, ResNet50 and EfficientNetB0 achieved accuracies of 61.54% and 33.33%, respectively, indicating fundamental limitations in learning discriminative features for this medical imaging task. MobileNetV2 proved to be the most efficient model, achieving superior accuracy with training and test times of 89 s and 38.16 s, respectively. Discussion: MobileNetV2 is highly suitable for clinical deployment where both accuracy and computational efficiency are critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.