ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Pain-free survival after endoscopic neurotomy versus radiofrequency ablation of the C2 dorsal root ganglion for cervicogenic headache: a real-world comparison study.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervicogenic headache (CEH) is commonly treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) targeting the C2 dorsal root ganglion (DRG), yet the durability of analgesia is often limited. Endoscopic neurotomy (EN) enables direct visualization of the target neural structures and may provide more sustained pain relief; however, supporting evidence remains limited. We compared long-term outcomes of EN versus RFA targeting the C2 DRG in CEH. Methods: Patients with a positive diagnostic C2 DRG block were treated with EN or RFA. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) were obtained at baseline, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The pain-free duration was recorded at every follow-up. The final follow-up was conducted in January 2026. Results: Of 76 included patients, 21 underwent EN and 55 underwent RFA. Both groups demonstrated significant reductions in NRS and improvements in EQ-5D-5L at 3 and 12 months postoperatively compared with baseline ( Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort, both EN and RFA improved pain and quality of life in clinically selected patients with CEH. EN was associated with longer pain-free duration; however, given its invasiveness and the diagnostic overlap between CEH and occipital neuralgia, EN should be considered cautiously as an escalation option in carefully evaluated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.