ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026
Glycosaminoglycans in axon growth and regeneration: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications.
Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding neurodegeneration and regeneration in the CNS: New concepts, clinical investigations, and an unsung hero of neuroscience.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are a structurally and chemically diverse family of sulfated polysaccharides that constitute a major component of the neural extracellular matrix and cell surface proteoglycans, where they exert pivotal regulatory functions in axon growth, guidance, synaptic organization, and regeneration. By forming highly specific and context-dependent interactions with axonal receptors, GAGs orchestrate the spatial patterning and temporal dynamics of signaling events after injury. Accumulating evidence indicates that the biological activities of GAGs are not dictated merely by their presence but are finely tuned by their sulfation codes, chain length, and domain organization. Recent mechanistic studies have revealed that distinct GAG species, particularly chondroitin sulfate (CS) and heparan sulfate (HS), exert opposing effects on axonal behavior through shared receptor systems. In the injured central nervous system (CNS), CS-rich extracellular matrices, prominently associated with reactive astrocytes and perineuronal nets, act as potent inhibitors of axon regeneration. These inhibitory effects are mediated through selective engagement of receptors such as protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma (PTPσ) leading to suppression of cytoskeletal dynamics and growth cone motility. In contrast, specific HS motifs promote axon elongation by inhibiting PTPσ. Based on these insights, therapeutic strategies targeting GAG biology have gained considerable attention. Approaches such as enzymatic digestion of inhibitory CS chains, development of synthetic or biomimetic GAGs, modulation of sulfation patterns, and gene editing of GAG-modifying enzymes have demonstrated encouraging efficacy in preclinical models of spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, and neurodegenerative disorders. Together, these findings indicate GAGs not only as passive structural components but as active, druggable regulators of axon growth and regeneration. This review integrates current advances in GAG structural biology, receptor interactions, and enzymatic regulation to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding how GAGs govern axonal behavior. We highlight unresolved questions and emerging opportunities for exploiting GAG-mediated mechanisms as actionable targets for next-generation neurorestorative therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.