ReviewCureus2026
Association Between Low Vitamin D Levels and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression is a globally prevalent, biologically heterogeneous condition for which standard pharmacotherapy fails approximately one-third of patients. Vitamin D receptors (VDRs) and the biosynthetic enzyme CYP27B1 are expressed in limbic cortical neurons, and calcitriol up-regulates tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH2), the rate-limiting enzyme in central serotonin synthesis. These observations suggest a plausible biological mechanism linking serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] deficiency to depression risk. Prior meta-analyses have pooled cross-sectional and longitudinal designs indiscriminately, limiting causal inference. We restricted eligibility to longitudinal study designs and multivariable-adjusted randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to reduce reverse-causation bias. Four databases were searched systematically from inception to December 2024. Eligible designs were prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, and registry-based studies and RCTs reporting multivariable-adjusted associations between baseline serum 25(OH)D and subsequent depression. Fifteen studies met all eligibility criteria (N = 49,931 participants). Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for 14 observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for the single included RCT. A DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis was performed. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for depression among participants with 25(OH)D deficiency was 1.45 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-1.56; Z = 10.61; p < 0.001), with no between-study heterogeneity (I² = 0%; τ² = 0.000; Q(df=14) = 11.13; p = 0.68). The association was consistent across study designs, geographic regions, deficiency thresholds, and depression assessment methods. European cohorts yielded the highest pooled estimate (OR 1.59; 95% CI: 1.40-1.82). Studies employing strict deficiency thresholds (<25 or <30 nmol/L) reported an OR of 1.66 (95% CI: 1.34-2.05). Sensitivity analysis restricted to high-quality studies (n = 13) yielded OR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.38-1.60). Egger's regression test was marginally non-significant (t = 2.02; p = 0.065). Low serum 25(OH)D is associated with a 45% increase in depression odds across 15 studies (14 longitudinal cohorts and one RCT), with homogeneous findings (I² = 0%). Adequately powered randomised trials pre-selecting participants on confirmed deficiency are needed to establish whether repletion reduces incident depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.