Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338851›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Diagnosing Sepsis in Primary Care: Navigating Clinical Uncertainty Across Vulnerable Patient Groups.

Omar Elbaroumi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Omar ElbaroumiGeneral Practice, NHS Independent Practice, Colchester, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a medical emergency characterised by life-threatening organ dysfunction arising from a dysregulated host response to infection. It represents one of the most significant patient safety challenges in the United Kingdom, responsible for tens of thousands of preventable deaths each year, with a growing burden of hospital admissions that has risen substantially over the past two decades. The majority of cases originate in the community, placing general practitioners (GPs) at the critical frontline of early recognition. Despite this, the evidence base for sepsis diagnosis in primary care is sparse, and widely used clinical tools, including the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), were developed and validated predominantly in hospital settings, limiting their direct applicability in general practice. This narrative review examines the diagnostic challenges faced by UK GPs in recognising sepsis, with a particular focus on vulnerable patient groups, including elderly and frail patients, children, and individuals with multimorbidity, who frequently present with atypical features that do not satisfy conventional diagnostic criteria. Published literature from 2015 to 2025 was reviewed alongside current UK guidelines, including the updated National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on suspected sepsis (NG253, NG254, NG255) and UK Sepsis Trust resources. Evidence suggests that the majority of GPs rely primarily on clinical intuition rather than validated screening tools, with gut feeling cited as the principal diagnostic method by up to 98% of practitioners, while formal tools such as qSOFA are used by fewer than 10%. Awareness of the UK Sepsis Trust criteria remains particularly low. Barriers to timely diagnosis include short consultation times, the low baseline prevalence of sepsis within the undifferentiated GP caseload, the increasing use of remote and telephone consultations, and limited access to point-of-care testing. The updated NICE guidance reasserts the primacy of clinical judgement alongside structured risk stratification, yet implementation in primary care settings remains inconsistent. This review concludes that sepsis recognition in UK general practice is a high-stakes diagnostic challenge compounded by atypical presentations in vulnerable patients and systemic barriers to timely assessment. Greater investment in GP-specific training, improved awareness of current guidelines, and the development of primary care-validated diagnostic frameworks are essential to reducing preventable sepsis-related mortality originating in the community.

Indexed as

atypical presentationclinical recognitiondiagnosisfrailtygeneral practicepatient safetyprimary careqsofasepsissepsis recognition

Identifiers

PMID42338851
PMCPMC13284339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.