ArticleCureus2026
Computed Tomography (CT)-Based Morphometric Analysis of the Glenoid Fossa and Its Clinical Significance in the Lucknow Region, Uttar Pradesh.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective The glenoid fossa is the lateral extension of the scapula's lateral angle, with a concave surface that articulates with the head of the humerus. Glenoid bone loss is frequently associated with glenohumeral instability. A thorough understanding of shoulder joint anatomy is essential, and the glenoid cavity index (GCI) provides a valuable measure for assessing the configuration and dimensions of the glenoid cavity. Restoring its normal anatomy improves joint function and reduces pain. Conventional two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) CT imaging remain the standard for evaluating the glenoid fossa and are crucial for preoperative planning in shoulder arthroplasty. This study was conducted to examine the morphometry of the glenoid fossa using CT imaging. Materials and methods CT scan data from 150 shoulder joints of 75 individuals (aged 30-70 years) were analyzed; the cohort included 35 males and 40 females. Scans were conducted using a Philips Brilliance 128-slice CT scanner at the Department of Radiodiagnosis, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. This retrospective observational cross-sectional study included individuals who had undergone head and neck CT scans that clearly captured the shoulder joint region without any evident pathology. Glenoid width and height were measured using 3D reconstructed images, and the GCI was calculated as (width/height) × 100. Glenoid version (angle β) was assessed on 2D multiplanar images and recorded as positive for anteversion and negative for retroversion. The formula applied was [Formula: see text]. Results The mean glenoid width and height on the left side were 23.04 ± 2.75 mm and 38.35 ± 4.26 mm, respectively; on the right side, they were 23.10 ± 2.45 mm and 38.14 ± 3.86 mm. The mean GCI demonstrated a statistically significant difference between males and females on the right side (p = 0.0159), whereas the difference on the left side was not significant (p = 0.064). Conclusions This CT-based study provides normative data on glenoid fossa dimensions, providing a valuable reference for surgeons and radiologists. Both sex and age should be taken into account during preoperative planning, as they are independent predictors of glenoid size, version, and index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.