Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338825›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Autologous Versus Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Insights From Recent Oncologic and Plastic Surgery Guidelines.

Esaúl Marroquín León, Daniel Sanchez, Ángel Gutiérrez Lamont, Sofía Rodríguez Palomino, Diana Laura Molina Medina, Olimpia Alejandra Méndez Campos, Marion Camacho Escárcega, Mariana Alcalá, Alexa Herrera Cohen, Xavier Antonio Sanchez Garcia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Esaúl Marroquín LeónMedicine, Universidad Westhill, Mexico City, MEX.
Daniel SanchezMedicine, Universidad Westhill, Mexico City, MEX.
Ángel Gutiérrez LamontResearch, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, MEX.
Sofía Rodríguez PalominoResearch, Universidad Anáhuac México Norte, Mexico City, MEX.
Diana Laura Molina MedinaResearch, Centro de Estudios Superiores de Tepeaca, Puebla, MEX.
Olimpia Alejandra Méndez CamposResearch, Universidad La Salle, Mexico City, MEX.
Marion Camacho EscárcegaResearch, Universidad Westhill, Mexico City, MEX.
Mariana AlcaláResearch, Universidad Anáhuac México Norte, Mexico City, MEX.
Alexa Herrera CohenResearch, Universidad La Salle, Mexico City, MEX.
Xavier Antonio Sanchez GarciaPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital Ángeles Pedregal, Mexico City, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mastectomy rates remain high in the management of breast cancer, which reflects the evolution of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction into a critical component of multidisciplinary care. The two primary methods for breast reconstruction consist of using the patient's own tissue (autologous) and implant-based procedures. The selection between the two procedures depends on three main factors, which include oncological requirements, surgical risk, and patient preferences. This article aims to synthesize recent clinical guidelines and literature to provide an evidence-based comparison of these surgical modalities. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to find current clinical practice guidelines and high-quality clinical studies about post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. The research assessed how cancer treatments affect patients through their evaluation of radiotherapy effects and complication rates, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which used the BREAST-Q tool for both autologous and implant-based groups. The use of prepectoral implants decreased pain and animation deformity but showed higher seroma rates and can also fail with radiotherapy. Autologous reconstruction provides superior long-term psychosocial and sexual life quality. The two main factors that determine reconstructive failure success rates include patients who are obese and smokers.

Indexed as

adjuvant radiotherapyautologous transplantationbreast implantsbreast reconstructionclinical practice guidelinesmastectomypatient reported outcome measuresprepectoral breast reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42338825
PMCPMC13284757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.