ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Atrial fibrillation prediction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based on long-term follow-up data and machine learning model.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) significantly increases the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) through distinct pathogenic mechanisms. This study develops a machine learning (ML) model to improve AF prediction in patients with HCM and investigates electrophysiological abnormalities and non-traditional factors as preclinical predictors. The findings aim to inform early warning systems and precision management strategies for AF in this patient cohort. Methods: This retrospective cohort study consecutively enrolled patients diagnosed with HCM who had no prior history of AF from 2014 to 2023. A two-step feature selection procedure involving the Boruta algorithm and LASSO regression was implemented, and four machine-learning based algorithms were trained and compared against the reference model of the HCM-AF score. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was utilized for interpretability. Results: A total of 225 patients (annual incidence ratio 3.42%, 225/1014) developed new-onset AF during the median follow-up period of 6.50 years. Twelve clinical variables were identified through the feature selection process, with the random forest model demonstrating the best overall performance with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.770 and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.699-0.840, outperforming the reference model (AUC 0.692, 95% CI 0.598-0.786) (Delong's Conclusions: The Random Forest model outperformed the HCM-AF score with robust predictive ability, validating P-wave indices as preclinical AF biomarkers through ML model for the first time. This integrated model offers a practical tool for early AF risk stratification in HCM, highlighting the clinical value of early symptomatic monitoring. Future multicenter validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.