Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338774›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cognition2026

Beyond the left-right brain divide: a framework for dual-domain cognitive fluency.

Don A Affognon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Don A AffognonDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longstanding distinctions between "verbal" and "mathematical" minds continue to shape educational assessment, curriculum design, and how learners are categorized by perceived cognitive strengths. Yet plenty of evidence from psychology and cognitive neuroscience points to a more unified model of intelligence that refutes the false dichotomy. In this article, I propose dual-domain cognitive fluency (DDCF) as a way to describe how the human mind can move fluidly between words and numbers and derive meaning from both. Building on research in symbolic cognition, executive function, and cognitive flexibility, this article identifies three dimensions: symbolic translation between modalities, cognitive flexibility across task demands, and layered reasoning, which integrates propositional logic with linguistic abstraction. DDCF captures the symbolic agility now required in knowledge-based environments where the integration of representational systems matters more than isolated domain expertise. Examples range from data storytelling in journalism to algebraic modeling in the social sciences-contexts in which verbal and quantitative reasoning operate in tandem. These insights matter for pedagogy, curriculum design, and the evolving demands of data-intensive workplaces. Far from a niche ability, dual-domain fluency reflects a generalizable cognitive capacity that existing models of intelligence have struggled to measure, reward, or systematically support.

Indexed as

cognitive flexibilitydual-domain fluencyexecutive functionrepresentational fluencysymbolic reasoning

Identifiers

PMID42338774
PMCPMC13271124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.