ArticleFrontiers in cognition2026
Curiosity in younger and older adults: the relationship between information value and memory.
Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Curiosity is a fundamental drive experienced throughout the lifespan. Beyond its health benefits, curiosity is associated with enhanced memory: Greater curiosity about information predicts improved recall in both younger and older adults. Recent work indicates that not only curiosity but also satisfaction with information and information prediction errors (IPEs)-the discrepancy between curiosity and satisfaction-can influence memory. However, less is known about how aging influences these affective variables. Methods: In this study, younger and older adults viewed trivia questions and rated their curiosity to learn the answers and their confidence in their knowledge of the answer. After the answer was shown, participants rated how satisfying they found it. Results: No age differences were observed: Across both age groups, confidence, satisfaction, and IPEs similarly predicted recall memory. In contrast, curiosity did not predict better recall memory in either age group, suggesting that satisfaction with information and IPEs play a more central role in learning trivia answers. Discussion: Overall, these findings show that pre- and post-information evaluations work cooperatively and independently to support memory across the lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.