Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338765›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cognition2026

Quality over quantity: joint group dance strengthens schoolchildren's social connections and wellbeing.

Bahar Tunçgenç, Chloe Wider, Katie Spreadborough, Kaleab A Kinfu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bahar TunçgençPsychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Chloe WiderPsychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Katie SpreadboroughFreedom Foundation UK Ltd., Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Kaleab A KinfuCenter for Innovation in Data Engineering and Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Children are experiencing high levels of loneliness and mental health problems around the globe, with those from underserved communities being affected disproportionately. Group dance programmes, which facilitate social connections and wellbeing, can buffer against loneliness. However, we know little about the mechanisms behind the effectiveness of these programmes and their long-term and group-level effects. This study examined whether it is mere engagement in group dance or better individual dance performance that fosters social connections and wellbeing. Methods: A pre-post design was used to assess the social connection and wellbeing effects of a 10-week-long group dance programme in schoolchildren ( Results: Linear mixed effects models and Social Network Analysis were conducted to examine change over time. Participation in group dance, but not dance performance, was associated with significant increases in reciprocal friendships and reciprocal best friends. Wellbeing improved over time, and an increase in friendship quality (i.e., reciprocal friendships), but not just quantity (i.e., social network size), predicted improvements in wellbeing. Conclusions: Joint group dance in a school setting can enhance wellbeing at individual-level and strengthen friendship quality at peer-level and whole-class level. These positive changes are observed regardless of individuals' performance, indicating that the joint nature of group dance can be sufficient to elicit social and wellbeing benefits.

Indexed as

childrencreative healthmental wellbeingschool-based interventionsocial connection

Identifiers

PMID42338765
PMCPMC13271117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.