ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Social connectedness in mobile gaming: how family dynamics shape children's virtual interactions.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mobile gaming is important for children's social interaction, but its impact on real-life social connectedness depends heavily on family dynamics. How family patterns shape children's emotional and social experiences around gaming remains underexplored, particularly qualitatively. This study examined how family dynamics influence children's belonging, emotion regulation, and virtual interactions in mobile gaming. Methods: Using a phenomenological design, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 participants from 10 families across urban, suburban, and rural China. Participants included children (n=10, aged 10-12), parents (n=8, all mothers), and siblings (n=2). All children had played mobile games for ≥6 months. Data were analyzed via thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke). Family patterns were identified based on parental mediation, emotional communication, and children's sense of connectedness. Results: Three family patterns emerged. Restrictive-Control Families (4/8) showed high monitoring and low trust, linked to concealment, tension, and social shift to virtual peers. Supportive Co-Play Families (3/8) exhibited shared play, emotional communication, and digital-offline continuity, with children reporting greater resilience and belonging. Sibling-Mediated Families (3 families) featured siblings as companions and emotional buffers, helping manage frustration without direct parental involvement. No severe conflicts or distress were directly caused by gaming in any pattern. Conclusions: Children's mobile gaming outcomes are shaped by relational context, not just time. This study identifies three family-level regulatory mechanisms: suppression (restrictive-control), cognitive reappraisal (supportive co-play), and co-regulation (sibling-mediated). These findings extend Social Connectedness Theory, showing how family patterns shape children's emotion regulation. Supportive co-play and sibling mediation facilitate adaptive regulation and connectedness, while restrictive-control may drive children to virtual spaces. Family-based interventions targeting emotion regulation, not just screen reduction, are recommended. Shifting from "anti-addiction" to "developmental enhancement" offers a safe, practical strategy for integrating gaming into family life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.