Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338714›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2026

Novel use of endoscopic pigtail drainage in recurrent gastric perforation following intentional drug overdose: a case report.

Milad Dodangeh, Hamidreza Kanani, Mohsen Soori

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Milad DodangehDepartment of General Surgery, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamidreza KananiDepartment of General Surgery, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohsen SooriDepartment of General Surgery, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptic ulcer perforation (PUP) is a life-threatening surgical emergency. Persistent perforation after conventional repair is rare, and minimally invasive salvage techniques are infrequently reported. We present a case where endoscopic pigtail catheter drainage offered a novel solution for a persistent leak. A 33-year-old man with substance use history developed generalized peritonitis after an intentional drug overdose. Emergency laparotomy revealed a 7 × 7 mm prepyloric perforation, repaired with a Graham patch. Premature oral intake led to a larger persistent perforation 5 days later, requiring repeat surgical repair. Persistent leakage continued for nearly a month and was successfully managed using an endoscopically placed pigtail catheter without a stent. The patient recovered completely, as confirmed at a 6-week follow-up. Endoscopic pigtail catheter placement is a minimally invasive, organ-preserving salvage therapy for persistent PUP after failed surgical repair. Further studies are needed to establish standardized protocols.

Indexed as

case reportendoscopic pigtail catheterminimally invasive drainagepeptic ulcer perforationpersistent gastric ulcer

Identifiers

PMID42338714
PMCPMC13286003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.