ReviewLiver cancer2026
Etiology-Based Treatment for Unresectable/Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focus on Viral Hepatitis and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis.
Review in Liver cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Combined Immunotherapy in Treating Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a keystone in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) therapy. However, preclinical evidence suggests that mice with pure metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH)-related HCCs may not benefit from ICIs. This has tremendous implications for both therapy selection and future drug development. Summary: Viral and MASH-HCCs differ in molecular pathogenesis and immune microenvironment. Preclinical evidence has shown impaired immune surveillance and ICI-induced auto-aggressive T cells in pure MASH-HCC. Phase 3 clinical trials and meta-analyses have conflicting outcomes. For single-ICI regimens with anti-programmed-death 1/L1 (anti-PD1/L1), there was no apparent difference in the overall survival for patients with non-viral HCCs in the CheckMate-459, IMbrave150, COSMIC-312, and KEYNOTE-240 trials for ICI over tyrosine-kinase inhibitors or placebo, while patients with viral hepatitis seemed to have benefited more. Meanwhile, comparable outcomes were seen for patients with viral and non-viral HCCs in the HIMALAYA, RATIONALE-301, LEAP-002, and CARES-310 trials. There was no consistent difference in outcomes between patients with HBV or HCV-HCCs. For dual-ICI regimens with anti-PD1/L1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4 (anti-CTLA-4), the HIMALAYA and CheckMate-9DW trials showed similar efficacy for ICI combinations across all etiologies. Important caveats in interpreting current evidence exist. All trial data are from unplanned subgroup analyses only, limiting the level of clinical evidence available. "Non-viral HCCs" are also a heterogenous entity, the composition of which varies from trial to trial. Fundamentally, defining HCC etiologies, especially in mutually exclusive terms, is challenging: Occult hepatitis B infections are inconsistently tested and reported; hence, viral HCCs may be underreported. HCCs are often multifactorial, with steatosis frequently co-existing and interacting with viral hepatitis, creating difficulty in translating findings from pure MASH-HCC mouse models. Key Messages: Current evidence is insufficient to support individualizing aHCC treatment based on etiology. Preclinical evidence for a lesser benefit with ICIs in MASH-HCCs exists, while data from clinical trials are mixed but limited. Major gaps in knowledge remain, and further studies are required to clarify this important subject.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.