ArticleERJ open research2026
Measuring the effect of azithromycin in chronic respiratory disease using continuous cough monitoring: an open-label exploratory trial.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Azithromycin is beneficial in a multitude of respiratory diseases; however, its effects on both subjective and objective measures of cough have been less extensively studied. Traditional 24-h cough counting assessments are highly variable, potentially underestimating the antitussive effect of therapeutics. Methods: Patients with asthma, COPD, interstitial lung disease and refractory chronic cough who reported cough as the predominant symptom were continuously monitored using a smart watch equipped with Hyfe cough detection software. Patients were monitored 1 week prior to and 4 weeks after commencing azithromycin. Participants were also assessed using patient-reported outcome measures and a 4-week daily cough visual analogue scale diary. Cough data were analysed using the novel cough metrics "relief of cough" and "cough density". Results: 30 participants with a broad range of respiratory diseases were recruited; 80% (n=24) had satisfactory usage of the cough monitor (>12 h·day Conclusion: This is the first study to assess the antitussive effect of a drug using continuous cough monitoring. Further trials should use this method of cough assessment to obtain a more granular assessment of cough in airways diseases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.