Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338673›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

Cardiovascular events in patients with COPD after long-acting bronchodilator initiation.

Dave Singh, Ana R Sousa, David E Newby, Michele Jonsson Funk, Miguel Roman-Rodriguez, Peter Kardos, Gema Requena, Alison Donald, David Slade, Chris Compton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dave SinghCentre for Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Ana R SousaClinical Sciences, Respiratory, Immunology & Inflammation Research Unit (RIIRU), GSK, London, UK.
David E NewbyBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Michele Jonsson FunkDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Miguel Roman-RodriguezHealth Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Palma, Spain.
Peter KardosGroup Practice and Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Unit, Red Cross Maingau Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4725-4820
Gema RequenaGlobal Epidemiology, Organisation of the Chief Medical Officer, GSK R&D, London, UK.
Alison DonaldDevelopment Biostatistics, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.
David SladeRespiratory Clinical Research Unit, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Chris ComptonR&D Global Medical, GSK, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Real-world evidence concerning the cardiovascular (CV) risk of umeclidinium (UMEC) monotherapy or UMEC/vilanterol (VI) is scarce. This real-world study investigated CV risk in new users of UMEC or UMEC/VI Methods: This prospective, observational, multinational, cohort study enrolled patients ≥18 years with COPD who initiated UMEC, UMEC/VI or TIO between 2 February 2016 and 31 January 2023. Noninferiority (95% confidence interval upper bound <2.0) of UMEC and UMEC/VI to TIO was compared for the time-to-first event (hazard ratio (HR) over 24 months) of a composite CV end-point of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or sudden cardiac death. Stabilised inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted for differences in baseline covariate balance between groups. Incidence rates for the composite CV end-point were calculated. Results: In total, 6606 patients were enrolled; 6165 were included in the analysis. Both UMEC (n=1246) and UMEC/VI (n=2448) were noninferior to TIO (n=2471) for the risk of the composite CV end-point (adjusted HR (95% CI): UMEC Conclusions: Both UMEC and UMEC/VI were noninferior to TIO for composite CV risk, suggesting that physicians may consider escalating patients to dual bronchodilator therapy if COPD symptoms are not effectively managed with monotherapy.

Identifiers

PMID42338673
PMCPMC13284813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.