ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Real-Time Stream Learning System for Monitoring Activities of Daily Living in Older Adults.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Monitoring activities of daily living (ADLs), such as walking, sitting, and stair climbing, is an important indicator of functional status, autonomy, and overall well-being in older adults. Traditional assessment approaches, such as questionnaires or offline machine learning models, struggle to adapt to dynamic environments and to the natural variability of human movement. This study aims to design, implement, and evaluate a real-time data collection and processing system that supports the training and assessment of Stream Learning (SL) models for ADL classification, and to compare their performance with conventional offline models. This study aims to design, implement, and evaluate a real-time data collection and processing system for ADL classification using Stream Learning (SL) models. Additionally, the study analyzes whether SL-based monitoring can provide more reliable and responsive metrics than traditional offline approaches under real-world conditions. Materials and Methods: The study involved nine adult participants during offline and online experimental phases aimed at evaluating real-time ADL monitoring under controlled and uncontrolled conditions. A mobile application captured accelerometer and gyroscope signals from smartphones and transmitted the data streams to a cloud server for window segmentation, label alignment, storage, and incremental model updates. Both offline models and SL algorithms were evaluated using precision, adaptability, and prediction stability metrics. The data captured were obtained through experiments approved by an Ethical Committee, and those involved signed an informed consent. Results: The system successfully enabled continuous real-time data acquisition and incremental model training. Offline models achieved competitive accuracy but limited adaptability to variations in movement patterns or acquisition conditions. SL models demonstrated more robust and stable predictions, adapting better to the natural variability of daily activities in real-world scenarios. Conclusion: The proposed system demonstrated the feasibility of integrating mobile sensing and SL for continuous ADL monitoring under real-world conditions. Compared with traditional offline models, SL approaches achieved superior adaptability, stability, and responsiveness during continuous operation, with Hoeffding Tree showing the best overall balance between accuracy and latency. These findings support the potential of SL-based systems for scalable and low-cost functional monitoring applications. Further validation using larger and clinically characterized populations is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.