ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Defending and including students with special educational needs: a qualitative study with Chilean students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study describes and interprets the subjective theories that a group of students from a public and state secondary school in the Atacama Region, Chile, hold regarding high-cost prosocial behavior on students with special educational needs (SEN). Methods: A qualitative methodology was employed, with an instrumental case study design. A total of 11 students, selected through theoretical sampling, participated in the study. Episodic interviews and a focus group were conducted, with the data being analyzed using thematic coding, grounded theory procedures, and specific analysis of subjective theories. Results: Findings show that high-cost prosocial behavior is linked to values of justice and inclusion, entails social risks for the benefactor, and has positive effects on well-being, educational inclusion, the academic performance of students with special educational needs, and school climate. Discussion: Family, school, and group factors are discussed in connection with the promotion of this type of prosociality, highlighting its formative potential with a view to pursuing a fairer, more inclusive educational environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.