Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338544›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Individual socioeconomic position among the general population and economic downturns-related perceived stress, psychological resilience, and wellbeing in Thailand.

Ratanaporn Awiphan, Chidchanok Ruengorn, Chabaphai Phosuya, Kiatkriangkrai Koyratkoson, Penkarn Kanjanarat, Kednapa Thavorn, Nahathai Wongpakaran, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Surapon Nochaiwong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ratanaporn AwiphanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chidchanok RuengornDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chabaphai PhosuyaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kiatkriangkrai KoyratkosonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Penkarn KanjanaratDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kednapa ThavornPharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Nahathai WongpakaranPharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Tinakon WongpakaranPharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Surapon NochaiwongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Economic downturns before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have been accompanied by adverse psychosocial outcomes. In Thailand, evidence on how individual-level socioeconomic position (SEP) relates to key psychosocial issues remains limited, and a standardized, simple SEP index is unavailable. We examined the associations between an individual SEP index and adverse psychosocial outcomes among working-aged adults. Methods: We recruited working-age adults aged 18-60 years using an online public mental health survey conducted in Thailand. The individual SEP index is based on a composite of educational level, personal income, occupational position, and housing overcrowding. The SEP index was classified as very low, low, moderate, and high. Psychosocial issues, including perceived stress, psychological resilience, and wellbeing, were measured using validated instruments. Associations between the SEP index and psychosocial outcomes were analyzed using weighted multivariable Tobit and ordinal logistic hierarchical regression models to account for potential confounders and the ordinal nature of the outcome variables. Results: Based on 1,992 participants, the sex- and age-adjusted prevalence estimates were 9.8% for the very low, 31.6% for the low, 48.0% for the moderate, and 10.6% for the high SEP index groups, weighted by the national population and Internet use rate. We found a significant association between the SEP index category, particularly among those in the very low group, and the degrees of higher perceived stress ( Conclusion: A simple individual-level SEP index was associated with perceived stress, psychological resilience, and wellbeing among working-age adults in Thailand during the early COVID-19 period. This index may help identify socioeconomically vulnerable groups for targeted mental health interventions; however, external validation is required before routine use in surveillance.

Indexed as

COVID-19Resilience, PsychologicalSocial ClassStress, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLow Socioeconomic StatusMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic FactorsSubjective Stressinequalitiesmental healthpsychological resiliencesocial determinants of healthsocioeconomic positionstresswellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42338544
PMCPMC13283863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.