ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Development and validation of a skin health knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors questionnaire for the general population: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Existing skin health assessments predominantly focus on single topics or diseases, making it difficult to cover the complete "Knowledge-Self-efficacy-Attitudes-Behaviors (KSAB)" continuum. Objective: To develop and validate a skin health knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors questionnaire for the general population. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among the general population between October and November 2025. The questionnaire was developed based on a conceptual structure incorporating four dimensions: knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes, and behaviors. Content validity was assessed by 13 experts, and the Item-level Content Validity Index (I Results: A total of 865 individuals were enrolled (men: women = 1.24:1). Content validity was good (I Conclusion: This study developed and validated a KSAB questionnaire on skin health knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors, showing good validity and item-level performance. The findings support targeted health promotion for men, older adults, and service/manual workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.