Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338533›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Can cross-sector governance improve urban health resource supply? Evidence from China's Healthy City pilot policy.

Jiexun Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jiexun ZhengLaw School of Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: China launched the national Healthy City pilot program in 2016 to translate Health in All Policies into municipal governance. The policy differs from sector-specific health interventions because it embeds health goals into urban planning, fiscal allocation, interdepartmental coordination, and accountability routines. Whether this cross-sector governance approach increases urban health resource supply remains empirically unresolved. Methods: This study constructs a city-year panel of 293 prefecture-level cities from 2007 to 2022. It applies a two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences (DID) design to estimate the effect of the Healthy City pilot on three health resource outcomes: hospitals and health centers, hospital beds, and licensed physicians. Event-study estimates, per-capita specifications with socioeconomic controls, six robustness checks, and a placebo test assess the credibility of the estimates. Results: The baseline DID estimates show that the pilot increased the log number of hospitals and health centers by 0.248 (SE = 0.061, Conclusions: Cross-sector governance can expand urban health resource supply by aligning fiscal priorities and administrative coordination around health goals. The largest effect appears for institutional capacity, while the smaller physician effect suggests that workforce supply requires complementary policies. Resource-scarce cities gain more from the pilot, indicating that governance-oriented health policy can support more equitable health system strengthening.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth ResourcesUrban HealthChinaCitiesHumansPilot ProjectsChinacross-sector governancedifference-in-differenceshealth in all policieshealth resource allocationhealthy citypolicy evaluationurban health

Identifiers

PMID42338533
PMCPMC13284050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.