ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Q fever has been considered a worldwide zoonosis caused by Coxiella burnetii, mostly transmitted by respiratory routes in contaminated environments with bio logical waste. Although urban recycling facilities may concentrate contaminated materials, their significance as potential environmental sources for C. burnetii infection has not been investigated to date. Methods: Accordingly, the aim of this study was to assess previous exposure to C. burnetii in recycling, non-recycling workers and their dogs from Curitiba, a major urban area currently ranked 8th in population with 1.8 million habitants, 7th in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and 10th in Human Development Index (HDI) out of 5,569 Brazilian cities. Results: In overall, 6/278 (2.15%) workers and 7/137 (5.1%) dogs were seropositive to C. burnetii by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Discussion: Due to low seropositivity, no risk factor was statistically associated with C. burnetii exposure. This was the first study to investigate C. burnetii infection in workers and dogs of urban recycling centers. Although low, positive cases have suggested likelihood of environmental expo sure to Q fever. Such findings highlight the importance of future investigations, as well as the need to ensure proper use of respiratory protective equipment among recycling workers in major urban areas of Brazil and worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.