ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2026
Predicting vasovagal syncope during head-up tilt test: three machine learning approaches.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Syncope prediction during head-up tilt testing (HUTT) remains challenging due to the complex interplay between autonomic and cardiovascular responses. This study investigates three computational approaches to forecast HUTT outcomes using continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) and blood pressure recordings from 105 patients with a history of syncope who underwent HUTT following a modified Italian protocol. Methods: Beat-to-beat heart rate and blood pressure signals were analyzed using: (1) gradient boosting models applied to frequency-domain features of heart rate variability (HRV); (2) an analytical modeling approach employing k-nearest neighbors (kNN) regression on transformed physiological signals; and (3) an incremental neural network model. Results and Discussion: Among these, the kNN regression approach provided the most consistent short-term forecasting of syncope probability, maintaining mean absolute errors below 0.13 for predictions up to 300 s before syncope onset. Gradient boosting models achieved promising classification performance with ROC AUC values up to 0.70, while the incremental network yielded moderate results. These findings demonstrate that data-driven analysis of early physiological changes can enable short-term forecasting of vasovagal syncope during HUTT, supporting the development of predictive tools for clinical risk assessment and personalized syncope management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.