ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes following flap and flapless implant surgery: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent advancements in implant therapy have improved the management of edentulism by reducing surgical invasiveness and enhancing clinical outcomes. Conventional flap techniques, although providing adequate access, are associated with complications such as crestal bone loss and soft-tissue recession. Flapless surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative that preserves periosteal integrity, reduces trauma, and promotes faster healing and patient comfort. Aim: The aim of the study was to compare soft- and hard-tissue changes following endosseous implant placement using flap and flapless technique. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled single-blinded study included 30 participants, with 15 implants each allocated to flap (control) and flapless (test) groups. Patients with adequate ridge dimensions and good oral health were included. Clinical parameters, including keratinized mucosa width (KMW) and peri-implant probing depth, were recorded at baseline and at 4 months. Radiographic evaluation using intraoral periapical radiographs was performed to assess crestal bone levels immediately after implant placement and at 4 months. Results: Both groups showed a significant reduction in KMW, with a greater reduction in the flapless group. Crestal bone levels were better preserved in the flapless group compared to the flap group at 4 months. No statistically significant difference in peri-implant probing depth was observed between the groups. Conclusion: Flapless implant surgery may offer advantages in preserving peri-implant hard tissues and reducing postoperative complications. However, long-term studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.