ReviewSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026
Biomaterial-Integrated Electroporation for Therapeutic Delivery: From Gene Editing to Tumor Ablation and Immune Modulation.
Review in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroporation has evolved from a membrane-permeabilization method into a versatile therapeutic platform for intracellular delivery, locoregional tumor intervention, and bioelectrically regulated treatment. Depending on pulse intensity and duration, electroporation operates in two distinct modes: reversible electroporation (RE), which transiently permeabilizes the plasma membrane to enable delivery of nucleic acids, proteins, and small molecules while preserving cell viability, and irreversible electroporation (IRE), which causes permanent membrane damage for non-thermal tissue ablation. Increasingly, the therapeutic scope of electroporation is being expanded through integration with biomaterials, including nanocarriers, hydrogels, soft conductors, and micro/nanoengineered bioelectronic interfaces. These material-assisted strategies improve cargo protection, field confinement, local retention, tissue conformity, and spatiotemporal control, thereby extending electroporation beyond conventional transfection toward gene editing, engineered cell manufacturing, electrochemotherapy, tumor ablation, immune modulation, and transdermal or localized delivery. In this Review, we summarize the biophysical principles of RE and IRE, discuss how biomaterials reshape electroporation performance across therapeutic settings, compare the design logic of major biomaterial-assisted electroporation platforms, and highlight key translational challenges, including pulse-material compatibility, manufacturing scalability, in vivo dosimetry, and regulatory complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.