ArticleEcology letters2026
(In)determinacy in Woody Plants: Limits and Opportunities for Timing Growth in a Changing Climate.
Article in Ecology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early-Season Warming Advances Autumn Senescence in Temperate Tree Saplings in Association With Early Growth Dynamics.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Article
- (In)determinacy in Woody Plants: Limits and Opportunities for Timing Growth in a Changing Climate.Ecology letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When and how much plants grow under environmental constraints are fundamental questions in biology and increasingly important for predicting biomass production and carbon sequestration under climate change. While temperature and water availability directly regulate plant growth, the timing and rate of growth are also shaped by internal developmental programming, though this is rarely considered in predictions of tree growth responses to future climates. Here, we revisit a concept central to this internal programming-(in)determinacy. Focusing on woody plants, we define it as the extent to which annual shoot growth is deployed from preformed organs versus produced de novo during the current season. We argue that this trait is best understood as a continuum and that it can help explain contrasting growth responses in a changing climate. More determinate species concentrate growth within a narrow seasonal window, which may reduce exposure to late-season stress but also limit their ability to exploit longer growing seasons. More indeterminate species retain greater flexibility to extend or resume growth when conditions remain favourable, which may be advantageous under climate change, but this same flexibility may also increase exposure to frost, drought and incomplete tissue maturation. Because primary shoot growth also shapes canopy development and is linked to other growth processes, variation in (in)determinacy could help explain broader differences in whole-plant performance, carbon gain and species responses to climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.