Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338283›Full record

ArticleTumori2026

Assessing in house comprehensive genomic profiling by liquid biopsy for NSCLC patients.

Andrea Vingiani, Alberta Piccolo, Adele Busico, Iolanda Capone, Elena Tamborini, Federica Perrone, Cinzia De Marco, Paolo Verderio, Chiara M Ciniselli, Claudia Proto and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tumori, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Andrea VingianiDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9827-3976
Alberta PiccoloDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2078-9988
Adele BusicoDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Iolanda CaponeDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Elena TamboriniDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Federica PerroneDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Cinzia De MarcoDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Paolo VerderioBioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Chiara M CiniselliBioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Claudia ProtoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Marta BrambillaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-7056
Giuseppe Lo RussoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Elena ConcaDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Andrea DevecchiDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Daniele LorenziniDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Luca AgnelliDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0582-6170
Giancarlo PruneriDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7963-7172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLiquid biopsy has emerged as a valuable tool for detecting therapeutic targets and resistance mechanisms. This study evaluated the analytical performance and clinical utility of TruSight Oncology 500 ctDNA (TSO500) compared to the FDA-approved Guardant360 CDx (G360) in detecting actionable alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients progressing on targeted therapies. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analyzed 44 plasma samples from 36 consecutive metastatic NSCLC patients with known molecular drivers (

resultsTSO500 demonstrated high sensitivity for G360-identified variants (81.02% overall; 85.26% for pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants). Concordance was particularly high for ESCAT I alterations (95.2% sensitivity), including 100% sensitivity for gene fusions (five detected fusions). TSO500 identified 102 additional variants not detected by G360. Among nine patients with concurrent tissue biopsy, TSO500 detected 16 potentially actionable mutations absent in tissue samples. Both assays identified resistance mutations in 12/26 patients (46.2%), with TSO500 detecting all but three G360-identified alterations. High correlation was observed between variant allele frequencies (Pearson's r = 0.89).

conclusionsTSO500 demonstrates high concordance with G360 for detecting actionable alterations and robust fusion identification. Its ability to detect additional variants and resistance mutations not found in tissue highlights its potential value in guiding personalized treatment decisions for NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

biomarkerscomprehensive genomic profilingctDNAliquid biopsynon-small cell lung cancertargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID42338283
PMCPMC13687596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.